Use When
Authorities destroy, hide, or tamper with case files and chain‑of‑custody materials.
Agencies order unlawful deletion or alteration of public data.
Regimes run warrantless digital surveillance.
Authorities engage in human rights violations.
Instructions
- 1
Define purpose and legal footing. Clarify preservation goals, lawful authority, and ethical boundaries; consult counsel on legal holds and secrecy laws.
- 2
Form a trusted core team. Recruit vetted legal experts, archivists, digital-security specialists, and survivor representatives with clear roles and separation of duties.
- 3
Identify priority records. Map which files, logs, or media face imminent destruction or tampering; set harm-reduction and triage criteria.
- 4
Design secure intake workflows. Establish encrypted submissions, tamper-evident chain-of-custody forms, metadata standards, and multi-person verification.
- 5
Train and recruit discreetly. Onboard helpers through trusted networks; train confidentiality, trauma-informed handling, and digital hygiene.
- 6
Preserve and duplicate safely. Secure physical archives, scan fragile materials, generate cryptographic hashes, and store copies offline in multiple repositories.
- 7
Document threats and seek orders. Log interference attempts and pursue preservation orders or injunctions where feasible.
- 8
Govern access and amplify responsibly. Maintain an oversight panel, redact sensitive data, publish integrity proofs, and coordinate findings with human-rights bodies without exposing sources.
Historic Parallels
- Berlin, 1989–1991, citizens secured Stasi files, leading to laws for vetted access and courtroom evidence.
- Guatemala City, 2005, preservation of National Police archives supported criminal prosecutions and historical truth-telling.
- Asunción, 1992, "Archives of Terror" discovery exposed transnational repression and enabled legal accountability.
Modern Examples
- Ombuds and bar associations issue legal holds. Archives use write-once media and hashes for security.
- Hotlines receive secure uploads; archivists redact personal data before placing files in escrow.
- Labs mirror materials with timestamps and integrity proofs to ensure court-ready authenticity.
Participants
Individual
Yes
8–15, including legal counsel, archival lead, digital security lead, documentation trainers, survivor liaison, communications lead, and a three‑person governance panel for access decisions.
Helpful Materials
- Fireproof cabinets
- Tamper-evident bags
- Archival-grade boxes
- Laptops
- Barcode labelers
- Chain‑of‑custody forms
- Hardware‑encrypted drives
References
- United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and University of California Berkeley, The Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations, 2020
- International Council on Archives, Principles of Access to Archives, 2012
- WITNESS, Ethical Guidelines for Using Eyewitness Videos in Human Rights Reporting, 2016
- Federal Commissioner for the Records of the State Security Service of the former German Democratic Republic, Stasi Records Act (English overview), 1991
- HURIDOCS, Open Source Information Management for Human Rights Documentation, 2021
Use of Action Playbook educational materials must adhere with Unruled Masses’ Terms of Service.
Stay Nonviolent. Coordinate Strategically. Take Back Your Power.
