Use When
Management quietly steals wages through unpaid overtime or off‑the‑clock work.
People who raise safety concerns or talk about forming a union are singled out for discipline or firing.
Invasive monitoring, blacklists, or immigration threats are used to keep workers silent.
Instructions
- 1
Form a core committee to analyze the specific workplace grievance, defining a clear, leverage-driven objective rooted in strategic nonviolent direct action.
- 2
Draft a concise, fact-based public statement that frames the abuse as a violation of shared values and clearly articulates non-negotiable demands.
- 3
Assign discrete organizational roles, including secure communications coordinators, internal marshals, and designated public spokespeople to maintain operational discipline.
- 4
Partner with labor attorneys, local worker centers, and human rights monitors to establish a legal defense framework before gathering signatures.
- 5
Identify structural leverage points within the company hierarchy to determine the most impactful delivery method and timing for the action.
- 6
Conduct secure, one-on-one outreach across shifts and departments to build broad, resilient solidarity and quietly secure commitments.
- 7
Prepare a media kit featuring anonymized worker testimonies and coordinate with trusted journalists to amplify the statement upon launch.
- 8
Gather signatures using encrypted tools or secure physical collection, then collectively deliver the ultimatum while documenting the interaction for safety.
- 9
Publish the statement externally, collect immediate documentation of any management retaliation, and leverage community allies to anchor the narrative.
Historic Parallels
- Silicon Valley, United States, 2018, thousands of Google employees signed a letter opposing the Pentagon’s Project Maven contract, helping push the company to drop renewal of the deal.
- Redmond, United States, 2018, more than a hundred Microsoft workers signed a public letter urging an end to the company’s contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, forcing executives to publicly address and defend their policies.
- Massachusetts, United States, 1974, a collective of socialist workers published the Combahee River Collective Statement, a signed manifesto detailing intersecting white-collar, labor, racial, and sexual oppressions that permanently revolutionized the structural framework of global human rights movements and labor intersectionality.
Modern Examples
- Warehouse workers sign a statement citing unsafe quotas and injuries. They demand realistic targets, more staff, and seats on safety committees.
- Software engineers sign a letter opposing a surveillance contract. They ask the firm to withdraw and implement a formal ethics review.
- Call-center staff protest unpredictable schedules and unpaid overtime. They deliver demands to HR and share anonymous data with labor journalists.
Participants
Individual
No
5–15 core organizers to draft and circulate the statement, plus as many rank‑and‑file signers as possible across teams, shifts, and demographic groups to show breadth of support.
Helpful Materials
- Secure messaging apps (Signal, Session)
- Shared document tools (CryptPad)
- Templates for statement and signature pages (DocuSign)
- Know-your-rights legal documentation
- Anonymized worker testimony templates
- Portable mobile charging banks
References
- Labor Notes, Secrets of a Successful Organizer, 2016
- Labor Notes, Back to School with Work to Rule in Ontario, 2015
- Government Accountability Project, Whistleblower’s Survival Guide, 2021
- American Civil Liberties Union, Know Your Rights: Protests and Public Meetings, 2022
- Michael Beer, Civil Resistance Tactics in the 21st Century, 2021
- The Combahee River Collective Statement, Home Girls, 40th Anniversary Edition, 307–318. Rutgers University Press, 2023
Use of Action Playbook educational materials must adhere with Unruled Masses’ Terms of Service.
Stay Nonviolent. Coordinate Strategically. Take Back Your Power.
